State v. Keating’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Ariegwe (2007), City of Billings v. Bruce (1998)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Weeks · State v. Arlington · State v. Hembd · State v. Gould
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The evidence regarding Keating’s awareness of the [officers’] reason for being at his residence ... and his threat after the [officers] attempted to serve him with process was sufficient to permit the jury to infer that Keating purposely or knowingly threatened the [officers] with the purpose to influence their exercise of discretion regarding where and when to accomplish service of process on him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[S]ince it is nearly impossible for the State to prove that anxiety and concern do not exist, the State's burden to show a lack of anxiety becomes considerably lighter in the absence of more than marginal evidence of anxiety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ariegwe“From a practical standpoint, it would be virtually impossible for the State to rebut presumed prejudice from an allegedly impaired defense without some showing by the defendant of actual impairment resulting in prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ariegwe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.