Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 N.C. 1 - State v. Henderson

State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

233
cited by 233 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

231 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 233 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably State v. Oliver (1981), State v. Britt (1974)

231 state decisions

156019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Wade · Mapp v. Ohio · Neil v. Biggers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 233 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The test under the due process clause as to pretrial identification procedures is whether the totality of the circumstances reveals pretrial procedures so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification as to offend fundamental standards of decency, fairness and justice.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, (2) the witness’ degree of attention, (3) the accuracy of the witness’ prior description of the criminal, (4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation, (5) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The practice of showing suspects singly to person for purposes of identification has been widely condemned. Stovall v. Denno, supra; State v. Wright, supra. However, whether such a confrontation violates due process depends on the totality of the surrounding circumstances. Stovall v. Denno, supra.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.