285 N.J. Super. 369 - Doring v. Doring’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Lepis v. Lepis · Martindell v. Martindell · 113 N.J. Super. 205 - Hallberg v. Hallberg · 144 N.J. Super. 491 - Clayton v. Muth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At least once every three years all IV-D orders for child support payments shall be subject to review in accordance with the rules promulgated by the IV-D Agency in consultation with the Supreme Court. Such review should take into account any changes in the financial situation or related circumstances of both parties and whether the order of child support is in full compliance with the child support guidelines.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the state must have in effect laws requiring the periodic review of all Title IV-D child support orders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.