State v. Vance’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “THE COURT: That's right. The original indictment was burglary in the first degree. You received three years probation through the Corrections Division on June 21, 1977. There is now on file with the Court a motion requesting that that probation be revoked for the reason that you on September 12th of this year, 1978, were found guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree. "Mr. Thorne, you are entitled to a hearing on this motion to determine whether you have in fact been found guilty of that charge, and then if you have, whether or not your probation should or should not be revoked. "* * * "THE COURT: Do you admit or deny that, Mr. Thorne, that you were convicted on September 12th, 1978, of robbery in the first degree? "THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I was.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 41 Or. App. 583 - State v. Thorne

2. “(1) A person commits the crime of robbery in the third degree if in the course of committing or attempting to commit theft he uses or threatens the immediate use of physical force upon another person with the intent of:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 41 Or. App. 583 - State v. Thorne

3. “[3] We note, however, that the Supreme Court has held that the following instruction, couched in terms of a permissive inference, does not shift the burden of proof to the defendant:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 41 Or. App. 583 - State v. Thorne