285 Or. App. 680 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Specifically, to establish that the prior conduct was relevant to show, using the doctrine of chances, that defendant acted intentionally and not by accident or mistake, the state would have had to establish that the prior conduct and the charged conduct were similar, as required by Johns .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there was a high degree of similarity between defendant's prior conduct and the charged conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in light of the record that was before the court at the time it made its decision,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.