Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 ORAPP 756 - State v. Leachman

State v. Leachman’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the forms of intoxication identified in ORS 813.010(1) make the form of intoxication an element of the crime of DUII.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “under the influence of intoxicants, to-wit: intoxicating liquor and controlled substances,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A jury instruction can have the effect of amending a charging instrument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.