Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 ORAPP 855 - State v. Edmonds

State v. Edmonds’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[u]nlike the state's argument for affirmance on an alternative ground, defendant's reliance on OEC 803(8) is an alternative ground for reversing the trial court, one that we will not consider unless the trial court's failure to exclude the evidence on that ground qualifies as plain error. Defendant could have raised his OEC 803(8) argument at trial, but he did not."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to the regular entries and systematic checking which produce habits of precision, to actual reliance of the business upon them, and to the duty of the record keeper to make an accurate record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “shown to have been made or adopted by the witness when the matter was fresh in the memory of the witness and to reflect that knowledge correctly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.