Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 S.C. 42 - State v. Skipper

State v. Skipper’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2011 · most notably Skipper v. South Carolina (1986), Williams v. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections (1987)

4 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

1101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Barefoot v. Estelle · Jurek v. Texas · Barclay v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We hold that where the defendant has not been convicted in the guilt phase of the crime relied upon by the State as the statutory aggravating circumstance, the limiting instruction must be given when the State introduces evidence of details of prior acts or crimes. In those cases the jury must be charged that such evidence can be considered only as to the defendant’s characteristics, and not as proof of the alleged statutory aggravating circumstance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial judge properly refused to admit evidence of [petitioner's] future adaptability to prison life. State v. Koon, supra. However, evidence of his past adaptability was admitted through testimony of his former wife, his mother and his own testimony. This contention is without merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.