285 So. 2d 204 - State v. Jack’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2008 · most notably 312 So. 2d 318 - State v. Elam (1975), 431 So. 2d 358 - State v. Vaughn (1983)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Cruz v. Hauck · Frey v. United States · Pope v. Nebraska · Sims v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The apparent conflict between these two Code articles has been resolved by the jurisprudence by allowing the trial judge, within his sound discretion, to release prospective jurors In [ sic ] advance of voir dire examination; the trial judge's decision in this matter is not disturbed unless there is a showing of fraud or collusion resulting in prejudice to the accused.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * Thus, there exists no showing of purposeful discrimination in the selection of the jury venire. The circumstance that the general venire was selected from the voter registration rolls does not, of itself, constitute a deprivation of constitutional rights. State v. Douglas, 256 La. 186 , 235 So.2d 563 , cert. denied, 401 U.S. 914 , 91 S.Ct. 888 , 27 L.Ed.2d 814 (1970); State v. Poland, 255 La. 746 , 232 So.2d 499 , penalty vacated and remanded, 408 U. S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 2862 , 33 L.Ed.2d 754 (1970).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Leichman“"An indictment is a written accusation of crime made by a grand jury. It must be concurred in by not less than nine of the grand jurors, indorsed `a true bill,' and the indorsement must be signed by the foreman. Indictments shall be returned into the district court in open court; but when an indictment has been returned for an offense which is within the trial jurisdiction of another court in the parish, the indictment may be transferred to that court."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Conway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.