Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

285 S.W.3d 491

Docket No. 04-07-00359-CV.

In Re Schmitz

In re Harold R. SCHMITZ, Norborne P. Cole, Jr., Brian C. Flynn, Jr., et al.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · decided 2007-07-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2009

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-07-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Debra J. McComas, George W. Bramblett, Jr., Nicholas Even, Haynes and Boone, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, Lamont A. Jefferson, Haynes and Boone, L.L.P., San Antonio, TX, for Appellant.

¶2Joe Kendall, Willie C. Briscoe, Hamilton Lindley, Provost Umphrey Law Firm, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, Darren J. Robbins, Randall Baron, Amber L. Eck, David T. Wissbroecker, Kevin K. Green, Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, San Diego, CA, Robert B. Weiser, The Weiser Law Firm, P.C., Wayne, PA, for Appellee.

¶3Sitting: CATHERINE STONE, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.

¶4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6The court has considered relators' petition for a writ of mandamus and the response of the real party in interest and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. See TEX.R.APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relators' petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

/285/sw3d/491 · .json · Public domain