¶1 ORDER
¶2 Mark D. Walker appeals the circuit court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief in which he claimed that the State failed to disclose that its witness had prior convictions. After a thorough review of the record, we *835 conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A published opinion would have no prece-dential value; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
¶3 Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).