Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 U.S. 467 - Shriver v. Woodbine Savings Bank

Shriver v. Woodbine Savings Bank’s Empirical Analysis

285 U.S. 467 · 1932

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2006 · most notably Hawks v. Hamill (1933), Brown v. O'Keefe (1937)

14 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

40019321940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Noble State Bank v. Haskell · Milliken v. United States · Jamison v. Encarnacion · Graham v. Goodcell · Price v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is true that, where a statute creates a liability and provides a remedy by suit specially adapted to its enforcement, other less appropriate common-law remedies are impliedly excluded. * * * Here the remedy provided is * * * summary and only partially effective * * * for enforcing the obligation to pay a sum certain * * * declared to be due and owing. The very fact that the remedy is on its face inadequate to compel full performance of the obligation declared is persuasive that it was not intended to be exclusive of applicable common-law remedies, by which complete performance might be secured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Administrative remedies for the collection of taxes, if not made exclusive by statute, do not preclude the recovery of the tax by a common-law action of debt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.