285 U.S. 527
Docket No. 646.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted March 14, 1932.
Decided March 21, 1932.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1932-03-21
2 counsel of record
Relies on State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener) · Staten Island Rapid Transit Company v. Transit Commission of the State of New York Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Company · Roe v. State of Kansas Smith
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1932-03-21
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2015
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Mr. Charles Fahy for appellant.
¶2Messrs. E. K. Neumann and Sam G. Bratton for appellees.
¶4The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Ry. Co., 282 U. S. 803; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.