¶1Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered August 10, 2001, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Schoenfeld, J., without costs or disbursements. In addition, we note service was defective as it was in violation of CPLR 2103 (a), as conceded by appellant at oral argument. No opinion. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
286 A.D.2d 267
Bloomberg v. Niebauer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 22, 2001
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2001-08-22
Decided 2001-08-22