Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

286 A.D.2d 404

People v. Heath

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2001-08-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2008

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-08-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosensweig, J.), rendered May 28, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and possession of burglar’s tools, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

¶2Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

¶3We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

¶4The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any non-frivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. O’Brien, J. P,, Goldstein, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.

/286/ad2d/404 · .json · Public domain