286 Conn. 914
945 A.2d 976
In re T.K.
Decided March 25, 2008.
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2008-03-25
Relies on In re T.K. · 105 Conn. App. 502 - In Re TK
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2008-03-25
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Maturo v. Maturo (2010), Wiseman v. Armstrong (2010)
2 district · 61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Penn Rhodeen, New Haven, in support of the petition.
¶2John E. Tucker, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
¶3The petition by the respondent parents for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn.App. 502, 939 A.2d 9 (2008), is denied.