Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 F.2d 165 - Bussey v. Plumbers Local No. 3 of United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of United States & Canada

Bussey v. Plumbers Local No. 3 of United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of United States & Canada’s Empirical Analysis

286 F.2d 165 · 1961

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1976
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776 · United Const Workers Affiliated with United Mine Workers of America v. Laburnum Const Corp · International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * But the protection of union members in their rights as members from arbitrary conduct by unions and union officers has not been undertaken by federal law, and indeed the assertion of any such power has been expressly denied. The proviso to § 8(b) (1) of the Act states that ‘this paragraph shall not impair the right of a labor organization to prescribe its own rules with respect to the acquisition or retention of membership therein * * *.’ [Citation] The present controversy is precisely one that gives legal efficacy under state law to the rules prescribed by a labor organization for ‘retention of membership therein.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.