Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 F.2d 471 - Irene Smith Cliett v. Mamie S. Hammonds

Irene Smith Cliett v. Mamie S. Hammonds’s Empirical Analysis

286 F.2d 471 · 1961

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 1962
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Konigsberg v. State Bar · Cliett v. Scott · Cliett v. Scott · Beaumont Irrigating Co. v. Delaune · Scott v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) filing or instituting or from causing to be filed or instituted any suit or judicial action against the Petitioners Mamie S. Hammonds, Reed Scott, Bertha Scott and Essie F. Scott, individually and as Independent Executrix of the Will and Estate of Jeff Scott, deceased, their tenants, heirs or assigns, respecting or relating to said Petitioners', their heirs or assigns, title to or right of possession of said 349.755 acres of land hereinbefore particularly described;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.