Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 F.2d 507 - Blazina v. Bouchard

Blazina v. Bouchard’s Empirical Analysis

286 F.2d 507 · 1961

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
March 2005
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1993), ACOSTA (1985)

39 federal appellate · 2 district ·

46019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Jay v. Boyd · Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Ass'n · United States ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ (h) The Attorney General is authorized to withhold deportation of any alien within the United States to any country in which in his opinion the alien would be subject to physical persecution and for such period of time as he deems to be necessary for such reason. * * * ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[should] be taken to mean confinement, torture, or death inflicted on account of race, religion, or political viewpoint.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[b]efore the Attorney General may grant relief under section 243(h) it must be shown to his satisfaction that, if deported, the alien would be subject not only to persecution, but to physical persecution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.