James v. Alexander v. Ivan R. Daugherty, Warden of Wyoming State Penitentiary, and the State of Wyoming’s Empirical Analysis
286 F.2d 645 · 1961
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 1983 · most notably Larry G. Linebarger v. State of Oklahoma and Ray H. Page, Warden (1969), Hopkinson v. State (1983)
14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Darr v. Burford · Frank v. Mangum · Ex Parte Hawk No - on Rule to Show Cause and Return · White v. Ragen · Turpin v. Warden of the Green Haven Prison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled that ‘a criminal prosecution in the courts of a State, based upon a law not in itself repugnant to the Federal Constitution, and conducted according to the settled course of judicial proceedings as established by the law of the State, so long as it includes notice, and a hearing, or an opportunity to be heard, before a court of competent jurisdiction, according to established modes of procedure, is “due process” in the constitutional sense.’ Frank v. Mangum, 237 U.S. 309, 326 , 35 S.Ct. 582, 586 , 59 L.Ed. 969 . See also Alexander v. Daugherty, 10 Cir., 286 F.2d 645 , cert. denied 366 U.S. 939 , 81 S.Ct. 1666 , 6 L.Ed.2d 849 ; Odell v. Hudspeth, [ 189 F.2d 300, 301 (10 Cir. 1951), cert. denied 342 U.S. 873 , 72 S.Ct. 116 , 96 L.Ed. 656 ]. * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.