United States v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
286 F.2d 753 · 1961
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
July 1968
most recently cited
21 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Railway Employes' Department v. Hanson · United States v. Spadafora · Tarkington v. United States · United States v. Spadafora
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Of course, it is well settled that questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence or involving errors of law or fact at the trial, must be raised by appeal from the judgment of conviction and not by a petition under section 2255. * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.