United States v. Cothran’s Empirical Analysis
286 F.3d 173 · 2002
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably United States v. Peppers (2002), United States v. Cartwright (2004)
16 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 32 · 18 U.S.C. § 35 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000) · 49 U.S.C. § 46507
Relies on United States v. Dent · United States v. McGlory · United States v. Rahman · United States v. Fulmer · United States v. Mariano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not our role to weigh the evidence or to determine the credibility of the witnesses.” Id. (citation omitted).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The standard of review is particularly deferential when deciding whether a jury verdict is based on legally sufficient evidence.” United States v. Cothran, 286 F.3d 173, 175 (3d Cir.2002) (citation and internal quotations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.