Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 F.3d 359 - In Re Troutman Enterprises, Inc.

In Re Troutman Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 8 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Singleton v. Wulff · Diamond v. Charles · Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Franchise Tax Board of California v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd. · Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by the order.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] party may only appeal a bankruptcy court order when it diminishes their property, increases their burdens or impairs their rights.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'is more limited than Article III standing or the prudential requirements associated therewith.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.