¶1 Michael Anthony Dammons appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny *19 Dammons’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dammons v. Carroll, No. 5:07-ct-03014-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.