286 F. Supp. 855 - Fox v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
October 1974
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 651 · 10 U.S.C. § 673A · 10 U.S.C. § 939
Relies on Orloff v. Willoughby · Winters v. United States · Winters v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. Petitioner’s status as Ready Reservist is based upon contract. In accordance with said contract Petitioner may not be ordered without his consent to perform more than forty-five (45 days of additional duty for training for unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve. “2. The ordering of Petitioner to involuntary active duty for more than forty-five (45) days because of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve, pursuant to authority derived from * * * [10 U.S.C. § 673a], constituted a violation of Petitioner’s enlistment contract, and application of said Public Law as to Petitioner constituted a violation of the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schultz v. Clifford“not assigned to or participating satisfactorily in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.