F.V. v. Barron’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 249 (Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) transgender people have been the subject of a long history of discrimination that continues to this day; (2) transgender status as a defining characteristic bears no relation to ability to perform or contribute to society; (3) transgender status and gender identity have been found to be obvious, immutable, or distinguishing characteristic[s]; and (4) transgender people are unarguably a politically vulnerable minority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to conclude discrimination based on gender identity or transsexual status is not discrimination based on sex is to depart from advanced medical understanding in favor of archaic reasoning”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]ransgender is an adjective used to describe a person who has a gender identity that differs, in varying degrees, from the sex observed and assigned at birth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.