Michel v. Michel’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 2024
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Mansell v. Mansell · Holler v. Holler · Hipps v. Hipps · Taylor v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We note that on remand, the trial court has a broad discretion to make an equitable division of [the marital property] upon consideration of all the relevant evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.