286 Ga. App. 32 - Tune v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 223 Ga. App. 690 - Cann-Hanson v. State · 274 Ga. App. 393 - State v. Sanders · 223 Ga. App. 65 - State v. Wintker · 266 Ga. App. 233 - State v. Pierce · 243 Ga. App. 705 - Harper v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, when a motion to suppress is heard by the trial judge, that judge sits as the trier of facts. The trial judge hears the evidence, and his findings based upon conflicting evidence are analogous to the verdict of a jury and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support [them]. Second, the trial court’s decision with regard to questions of fact and credibility must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. Third, the reviewing court must construe the evidence most favorably to the upholding of the trial court’s findings and judgment. 2”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The probable cause needed to conduct an arrest for DUI requires that the officer have knowledge or reasonably trustworthy information that a suspect was actually in physical [custody] of a moving vehicle, while under the influence of alcohol . . . [that] renders [her] incapable of driving safely. 14”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gauthier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.