Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 Ga. App. 331 - Millender v. State

286 Ga. App. 331 - Millender v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2023

17 state decisions

100200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · McCrary v. State · 174 Ga. App. 444 - Hambrick v. State · Smith v. State · Martin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). As long as there is some competent evidence, even though contradicted, to support each fact necessary to make out the [s]tate’s case, the jury’s verdict will be upheld.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “upon consideration of the words, conduct, demeanor, motive, and all other circumstances connected with the act for which the accused is prosecuted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Cl

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.