Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 ILL 536 - Niblack v. Farley

Niblack v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
April 1977
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1977

14 state decisions

901919192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Golden v. Cervenka

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where notes or other securities have been executed to a bank for the purpose of making an appearance of assets, so as to deceive the examiner and enable the bank to continue business, although the circumstances may have been such that the bank itself could not have collected the securities, it has been held that the receiver, representing the creditors, could maintain the action, and the makers were estopped upon the insolvency of the bank, to allege want of consideration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.