Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 N.C. 366 - State v. Joyner

State v. Joyner’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2014 · most notably Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp. (2004), Hart Book Stores, Inc. v. Edmisten (1979)

10 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

35019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish · Blades v. City of Raleigh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ijn examining the reasonableness of an ordinance, due process dictates that the court look at the entire ordinance and not only at the provision as it applies to a particular inhabitant of the municipality. The fact that one citizen is adversely affected by a zoning ordinance does not invalidate the ordinance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘. . . When the termination provisions are reasonable in the light of the nature of the business of the property owner, the improvements erected on the land, the character of the neighborhood, and the detriment caused the property owner, we may not hold them constitutionally invalid.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “... any city may regulate and restrict the height, number of stores and size of buildings and other structures, ... and the location and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence or other purposes____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.