Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 N.C. 387 - State v. Ketchie

State v. Ketchie’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably State v. McZorn (1975), State v. Cheek (1999)

50 state decisions

20019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spinelli v. United States · Roviaro v. United States · Draper v. United States · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary · McCray v. State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““What is usually referred to as the informer’s privilege is in reality the Government’s privilege to withhold from disclosure the identity of persons who furnish information of violations of law to officers charged with enforcement of that law. ... The purpose of the privilege is the furtherance and protection of the public interest in effective law enforcement. The privilege recognizes the obligation of citizens to communicate their knowledge of the commission of crimes to law-enforcement officials and, by preserving their anonymity, encourages them to perform that obligation. * * * * “We believe that no fixed rule with respect to disclosure is justifiable. The problem is one that calls for balancing the public interest in protecting the flow of information against the individual’s right to prepare his defense. Whether a proper balance renders nondisclosure erroneous must depend on the particular circumstances of each case, taking into consideration the crime charged, the possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer’s testimony, and other relevant factors.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “where the informer directly participates in the alleged crime so as to make him a material witness on the issue of guilt or innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.