286 N.J. Super. 58 - Rosenberg v. Rosenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2018
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Williams v. Williams · Singer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he initial focus in the calculus is appropriately directed to the time expended in pursuing the litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“transactions between an attorney and the attorney's client are subject to close judicial scrutiny”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“time expended is only one of the factors to be considered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.