Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 NW2D 120 - State v. Kidd

State v. Kidd’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Carpenter v. City of Belle Fourche (2000), State v. Dace (1983)

36 state decisions

22019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Burtts · State v. Kindvall · State v. Norman · State v. Havens · State v. Luna

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N]o hard and fast rules exist which state with certainty when prosecutorial misconduct reaches a level of prejudicial error which demands reversal of the conviction and a new trial; each case must be decided on its own facts. Furthermore, we will not disturb the trial court's ruling on a motion for a new trial based on misconduct of counsel unless we are convinced there has been a clear abuse of discretion. (Citations omitted).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the trial judge was on the scene, had heard the arguments and had the opportunity to know whether [the improper remarks] had any apparent effect on the jury. He apparently didn’t feel that they had and we accede to his judgment lacking any showing on the part of the defense of actual bias or prejudice. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.