Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 NW2D 157 - State v. Paulsen

State v. Paulsen’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Briggs · State v. Hall · 10 Ariz. App. 556 - State v. Good · Commonwealth v. Favulli · State v. Joao

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to examine witnesses, present documents, explain law, summarize the evidence, and request an indictment. The prosecutor is barred from expressing opinions on the facts and from attempting to influence the grand jury's action [but] ... [p]rosecutorial misconduct infringes due process when a reasonable likelihood exists that it may induce action other than that which the grand jurors in their uninfluenced judgment would take.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.