Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 N.Y. 137 - People v. Cox

People v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
12
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably United States v. DiGilio (1976), Commonwealth v. Donovan (1985)

3 federal appellate · 50 state decisions — followed in 12 states

120194119501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 75 W. Va. 7 - State v. Wetzel · Willis v. State · State v. Kurth · Matter of Christiansen v. Hill Reproduction Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As long as the larceny is held to be pursuant to a single intent, and one complete illegal scheme, it matters not the length of the period over which the takings continued.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Logic and reason join with all the authorities that have considered the question, in holding that the People may prosecute for a single crime a defendant who, pursuant to a single intent and one general fraudulent plan, steals in the aggregate as a felon and not as a petty thief. If this were not so, a crime of grand larceny would go unpunished and a felon escape because the law classified him only as a petty thief.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.