286 Or. App. 306 - State v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“other than initially me coming back to her saying (-Inaudible-) you're on parole. If [Shaw] has a warrant and you're telling me he's Jonathan and he's Jimmy there's going to be trouble for you * * * potentially through your P[arole] O[fficer].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stevens“all that [Klopfenstein] had done was ask defendant questions, request information, and seek her cooperation with respect to [the] investigation of Shaw's identity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stevens“[S]omething more than just asking a question, requesting information, or seeking an individual's cooperation is required of an officer's conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stevens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.