Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 ORAPP 673 - State v. Ortega

State v. Ortega’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'When a defendant asks to represent himself, the court must determine, on the record, whether his decision is an intelligent and understanding one.' Further the court must 'determine whether granting the defendant's request would disrupt the judicial process.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “revers[e] and remand as to the counts on which defendant was convicted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.