Leason v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1957
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Nardone v. United States · Flagg v. United States · 95 Okla. Crim. 98 - Taylor v. State · 83 Okla. Crim. 340 - Edwards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where an unauthorized search and seizure is commenced and in progress, the issuance of a search warrant for the purpose of making valid that which in its inception was illegal will afford no protection to the officer making such search and seizure.” See also Dean v. State, 37 Okl.Cr. 396 , 258 P. 912 ; Wallace v. State, 49 Okl.Cr. 281 , 294 P. 198 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hamel v. State““A search and seizure illegal at its inception cannot be legalized by what it brings to light.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hamel v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.