Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 S.C. 12 - Loftis v. Loftis

Loftis v. Loftis’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2001

5 state decisions

20198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bass v. Bass · Gainey v. Gainey · Glass v. Glass · Bank of Augusta v. Satcher Motor Co. · Crocker v. Crocker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While it is true that pleadings in the family court must be liberally construed, this rule cannot be stretched so as to permit the judge to award relief not contemplated by the pleadings. Due process requires that a litigant be placed on notice of the issues which the court is to consider.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.