Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 S.C. 249 - Cartee v. Lesley

Cartee v. Lesley’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2003

5 state decisions

20198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Hagan · Shearer v. DeShon · 111 Ga. App. 245 - Miller v. Travelers Insurance Co. · Industrial Welding Supplies, Inc. v. Atlas Vending Co. · Chapman v. Foremost Dairies, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general rule is that an injunction should be granted only where some irreparable injury is threatened for which there is no adequate remedy at law. Whether a wrong is irreparable in the sense that equity may intervene, and whether there is an adequate remedy at law for a wrong, are questions that are not decided by narrow and artificial rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.