Villarreal v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

42 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Once a court of appeals has determined such a claim of ‘factual’ insufficiency, this Court may not conduct a de novo review of the lower court’s determination.”). . Neither the State nor the appellant has contested the propriety of the court of appeals’s ultimate disposition; neither party argues that the court of appeals erred, even in light of its holding that the juvenile court abused its discretion to waive jurisdiction, to declare that the cause remains”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Moon, Cameron

2. “Such a charge is one that accurately sets out the law, is authorized by the indictment, does not unnecessarily increase the State's burden of proof or unnecessarily restrict the State's theories of liability, and adequately describes the particular offense for which the defendant was tried.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Diruzzo v. State