Hubert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 214th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Matlock · Illinois v. Rodriguez · Ohio v. Robinette · Georgia v. Randolph
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether consent was valid is a question of fact.” Hubert, 286 S.W.3d at 490 (citing Maxwell v. State, 73 S.W.3d 278, 281 (Tex.Crim.App.2002)). Maxwell , in stating that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hubert v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.