Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 S.W.3d 925 - In Re Hall

In Re Hall’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio))

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania v. Finley · Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. · Texas Department of Transportation v. Needham · McIntyre v. Ramirez · Ex Parte Graves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although quasi-criminal in nature, proceedings in juvenile court are considered civil cases; thus, this Court, rather than the Court of Criminal Appeals, is the Texas court of last resort for such matters.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Court of Criminal Appeals has concluded that it lacks jurisdiction to issue extraordinary writs in such cases, even those initiated by a juvenile offender who has been transferred to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice because he is now an adult.... [I]t is the applicant's age at the time he commits the delinquent acts that determines jurisdiction, rather than his age when applying for habeas corpus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re MPA

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.