Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 286 U.S. 123 - Fox Film Corporation v. Doyal

Fox Film Corporation v. Doyal’s Empirical Analysis

286 U.S. 123 · 1932

Citation profile

385
cited by 385 later decisions
60
cited 60 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

100 federal appellate · 29 district · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 385 later decisions (60 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LL (2006), National League of Cities v. Usery (1976)

100 federal appellate · 29 district · 62 state decisions — followed in 18 states

14501932194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Continental Paper Bag Company v. Eastern Paper Bag Company · Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co. · Van Brocklin v. Anderson · Indian Motocycle Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 385 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may refrain from vending or licensing [its product] and content [itself] with simply exercising the right to exclude others from using [its] property.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. (Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 8)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “As this Court has repeatedly said, the Congress did not sanction an existing right but created a new one”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.