Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2000
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · United States v. Harriss · Bouie v. City of Columbia · Rideau v. Louisiana · Norton v. Shelby County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whoever, being a bailee of money or other property which may be the subject of larceny, to the value of $100 or more, embezzles or fraudulently converts the same to his own use, shall be fined in such amount or imprisoned for such term, or both, as the court, in its discretion, may determine.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As a citizen of this state, appellant is presumed to know the statutes and existing rules of law of this state, and we find no evidence which would excuse ignorance of their status.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.