Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 Ala. 549 - Seibold v. State

Seibold v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
4
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

129 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably Tillis v. State (1974), 416 So. 2d 1083 - Walker v. State (1982)

129 state decisions

91019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United States · Parsons v. State · Boyle v. State · Reedy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although this section speaks of the ‘mental condition’ of the accused it seems clearly directed towards the specific inquiry whether an indicted person suffered from any mental disease or defect which would affect his present criminal responsibility or his criminal responsibility at the time of the commission of the crime. It is plain that this section does not expressly require any determination by the lunacy commission as to the mental capacity of the accused person, already under indictment in a capital case, to stand trial.” 386 F.2d at 106 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"If any person charged with any felony be held in confinement under indictment, and the trial court shall have reasonable ground to doubt his sanity, the trial of such person for such offense shall be suspended until the jury shall inquire into the fact of such sanity, such jury to be impaneled from the regular jurors in attendance for the week or from a special venire, as the court may direct."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.