Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 F.1d 254 - In re Feinberg

In re Feinberg’s Empirical Analysis

287 F. 254 · 1923

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 1956
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1956

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

201923193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bridget McLaughlin v. The Bank of Potomac

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the right to object is not a personal right of the creditor, but one for the benefit of all, is, I think, well settled by the cases holding that advantage may be taken of a false statement in opposition to discharge by other parties in interest than the creditor from whom the credit was obtained.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.