Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 F.2d 27 - Nina Jones v. Union Automobile Indemnity Association of Bloomington, Illinois, a Corporation

Nina Jones v. Union Automobile Indemnity Association of Bloomington, Illinois, a Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2006

10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

10019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Petsch · Horn v. Allied Mutual Casualty Co., Des Moines · Fisher v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co. · Marett v. World Fire & Marine Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court denied Jones the right to testify because she was not named on witness lists that apparently had been exchanged pursuant to pretrial proceedings. This ruling was wrong. If there were pre-trial proceedings, and the record does not disclose such proceedings, no pre-trial order was entered as required by Rule 16, F.R.Civ.P. Absent such an order the exchange of witness lists does not limit the number of witnesses or act as a bar to the testimony of a witness not named thereon. If pre-trial is to be used for such a purpose there must be a pre-trial order. ...” Id. at 29 .-”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.