Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 F.2d 282 - Bowdoin v. Malone

Bowdoin v. Malone’s Empirical Analysis

287 F.2d 282 · 1961

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 1962
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lee · Hudson v. Newell · Mackintosh v. Estate of Marks · Stewart v. United States · Ramey v. O'Byrne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We hold that the district court erred in requiring all persons having or claiming any interest in the lands to be made parties, and in dismissing the suit upon plaintiffs' failure to join those whose joinder would have defeated the jurisdiction of the court. Instead, the court should retain jurisdiction and limit any relief granted to such as can be given without prejudice to the absent parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.